Camacho

(PC) Bishop v. Camacho

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20212:20-cv-01762California1,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOR AHMADD BISHOP, Case No. 2:20-cv-01762-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING

v. ORDER AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND

P. CAMACHO, DISCOVERY-RELATED MOTION Defendant. ECF Nos. 37, 39, 48, 54 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED ECF No. 44 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 20 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Five motions are pending before the court, all of which are addressed herein. Plaintiff has filed two separate motions for extension of time. ECF Nos. 37 & 39. Neither motion identifies the deadline that plaintiff seeks to extend; therefore, each is denied without 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.