Aung

(PC) Wilhelm v. Aung

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20212:20-cv-01682California3,875 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE WILHELM, No. 2:20-CV-1682-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SANDAR AUNG, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant Aung’s unopposed motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 25. Plaintiff’s single claim alleges that Defendant Aung was deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs. See ECF No. 1, pg. 4. Defendant Aung contends that she was not deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs and that she is entitled to qualified immunity. See ECF No. 25, pgs. 10, 12. 23 I. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s original complaint. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiff, Steve Wilhelm, named Drs. Aung and Vaughn as defendants. See id. Defendant Vaughn has been dismissed from the action. See ECF No. 20 (District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.