Baughman
(PC) Martinez v. Baughman
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20211:19-cv-01459California1,263 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD F. MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01459-DAD-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
D. BAUGHMAN, et al., (Doc. 63)
Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF AS
MOOT
(Doc. 75)
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(A). (Doc. 63.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that the motion be granted. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this matter on October 21, 2019. (Doc. 3.) In response to questions asking if Plaintiff had “received any money . . . over the last twelve months,” Plaintiff answered, “No.” (Id. at 1.) In response to a question asking if he…