Baughman

(PC) Martinez v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20211:19-cv-01459California1,263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD F. MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01459-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

D. BAUGHMAN, et al., (Doc. 63)

Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF AS

MOOT

(Doc. 75)

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(A). (Doc. 63.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that the motion be granted. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this matter on October 21, 2019. (Doc. 3.) In response to questions asking if Plaintiff had “received any money . . . over the last twelve months,” Plaintiff answered, “No.” (Id. at 1.) In response to a question asking if he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.