(PS) Hedrington v. County of Solano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORLONZO HEDRINGTON, No. 2:21-cv-0414 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER
COUNTY OF SOLANO, FAIRFIELD
POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL
ARIMBOANGA, DAVID GRANT
MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 13, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff objected to the findings and recommendations, ECF Nos. 36, 38, and the United States responded, ECF No. 37. The court has reviewed the file de novo. The Magistrate Judge correctly determined that this court has no subject matter jurisdiction over claims…