Harris
(PC) Spearman v. Harris
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Reginald E. Spearman, No. 2:21-cev-01215-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. Deborah A. Harris, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Reginald Spearman is detained and is proceeding without counsel in this matter, which was referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge under this District’s Local Rules and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action under the screening 20 procedures of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 7. Mr. Spearman objects, ECF No. 9, and the court has reviewed the file de novo, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). This court must ensure it has jurisdiction before considering any person’s claims. United 23 States v. Hays, 515 U.S. 737, 742 (1995). Although Mr. Spearman refers briefly to “civil rights,” See Compl. at 2, ECF No. 1, he asserts no claims arising under federal law and does not allege he 25 was deprived of constitutional rights, see 28…