Hicks

(PC) Washington v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20211:19-cv-00156California4,907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL IN PART

vs. (ECF No. 41.)

HICKS, et al., FORTY-FIVE-DAY DEADLINE FOR

DEFENDANT ROCHA TO PRODUCE

Defendants DOCUMENTS REQUESTED BY

PLAINTIFF IN HIS REQUEST FOR

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENT, SET ONE,

NO. 2, PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER

17 I. BACKGROUND Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on February 5, 2019, against defendants Sergeant David Hicks and Correctional Officer Hipolito Rocha (“Defendants”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)1 On December 7, 2020, Defendant Rocha filed an Answer to the Complaint. On December 8, 2020, the court issued a Discovery and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.