Hicks
(PC) Washington v. Hicks
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20211:19-cv-00156California4,907 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL IN PART
vs. (ECF No. 41.)
HICKS, et al., FORTY-FIVE-DAY DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT ROCHA TO PRODUCE
Defendants DOCUMENTS REQUESTED BY
PLAINTIFF IN HIS REQUEST FOR
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENT, SET ONE,
NO. 2, PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER
17 I. BACKGROUND Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on February 5, 2019, against defendants Sergeant David Hicks and Correctional Officer Hipolito Rocha (“Defendants”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.)1 On December 7, 2020, Defendant Rocha filed an Answer to the Complaint. On December 8, 2020, the court issued a Discovery and…