Manzo

Manzo v. McDonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20211:20-cv-01175California1,648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GENNIFER MANZO, Case No. 1:20-cv-1175-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR

v. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT

MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a corporation, AND (Doc. No. 15) DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Gennifer Manzo’s unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and Private Attorneys General Act Settlement. (Doc. No. 15). In evaluating a class action settlement, a court must determine, inter alia, whether the plaintiff’s claims are typical of those of the class and whether the plaintiff can adequately represent the class. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(3)-(4); Rodriguez v. Hayes, 591 F.3d 1105, 1124 (9th Cir. 2010). (See also Doc. No. 15 at 9). The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that “the interest of the named representative aligns with the interests of the class.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.