Pfeiffer
(PC) Hudson v. Pfeiffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL HUDSON, Case No. 1:19-CV-00954-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
v. DISMISS1 C. PFEIFFER, R. COX, J. DIAZ, D. (Doc. No. 20)
BALKIND, R, NUCKLES,
15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Darryl Hudson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on his civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) in response to the complaint. (Doc. No. 20). Defendants request the Court take judicial notice of Plaintiff’s inmate grievances concerning the incident at issue. (Doc. No. 21) (citing Exhibit A at 6-8). Plaintiff filed an opposition. (Doc. No. 24). And Defendants filed a reply. (Doc. No. 25). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss because the complaint was filed after the statute of limitations expired.…