Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. R and L Business Mgt.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20212:21-cv-00397California1,387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, a No. 2:21-cv-00397 WBS JDP Delaware corporation, formerly known as ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, and successor to ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER RE: DEFENDANT CITY OF

WEST SACRAMENTO’S MOTION IN

Plaintiff, LIMINE TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF’S

EXPERT WITNESS

v. CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO; and ROES 1-50, inclusive, 18 Defendants.

20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Defendant City of West Sacramento (“City”) has moved to exclude the testimony of plaintiff Arrowood’s expert witness, Thomas Delfino, both in connection with the pending cross motions for summary judgment and at trial. (See Mot. (Docket No. 47-1).) On December 13, 2021, the court held a hearing on the motion. As stated there, and as explained below, the court will deny the City’s motion. I. Qualifications Expert opinion evidence is admissible if, among other things, “the witness is sufficiently qualified as an expert…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.