Williams v. Fannie Mae
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 APRIL PREMO WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00848-AWI-HBK
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
Plaintiff, GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS THE COMPLAINT AND REQUEST
FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE1 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS REQUEST
TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
FANNIE MAE, et al., (Doc. Nos. 9, 10) 17 Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss Plaintiff April Premo Williams’s (“Plaintiff” or “Williams”) initial pro se complaint filed by Defendants Bank of America, N.A., Federal National Mortgage Association (dba Fannie Mae), Hugh Frater, Brian Moynihan, and Adriana Rodriguez on September 13, 2021. (Doc. No. 9). Defendants also filed a request for judicial notice in support of this motion. (Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Not Dismiss 27 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and…