Jackson v. City of Modesto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20211:21-cv-00415California1,574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ESTATE OF KIM JACKSON, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00415-AWI-EPG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

CITY OF MODESTO, et al., (ECF No. 28) Defendants.

15 This matter is before the Court on the request to stay discovery by Defendants City of Modesto and Galen Carroll (hereinafter Defendants unless otherwise designated). (ECF No. 28). On December 6, 2021, the Court heard argument from both sides regarding whether to issue a scheduling order in this case during the pendency of Defendants’ motion to dismiss, taking the matter under advisement. (ECF No. 29). Having considered the matter, the Court will grant Defendants’ construed motion to stay discovery and will not issue a scheduling order until the pending motion to dismiss has been adjudicated. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, Estate of Kim Jackson, Matthew Boring, Alyssa Cabrera, Glenn Jackson, and Anna Jackson (who are the estate, parents, and children of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.