(PC) Dixon v. Sacramento Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20212:21-cv-01510California406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MITCHELL DIXON, JR., No. 2:21-cv-1510 AC P Plaintiff,

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed September 13, 2021, plaintiff was given thirty days to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. ECF No. 4. He was warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Id. In response, plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis but did not provided the required trust account statement. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was then provided an additional thirty days to submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement and warned that failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.