(PC) Villalobos v. Tiggs-Brown, P.A

facts related to that claim. 2 Both parties have raised evidentiary objections, which the Court has carefully reviewed. To the extent the Court necessarily relied on evidence that has been objected to, the Court relied only on evidence it considered to be admissible. It is not the practice of the Court to rule on evidentiary matters individually in the context of summary judgment. This is particularly true when “many of the objections are boilerplate recitations of evidentiary principles or blanket objections without analysis applied to specific items of evidence.” Capital Records, LLC v. BlueBeat, Inc., 765 F.Supp.2d 1198, 1200 n.1 (C.D. Cal. 2010) (quoting Doe v. Starbucks, Inc., 2009 WL 5183773, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2009)). To the extent any objections warrant individual discussion, they are addressed in further detail in the analysis of the merits of the motion. 3 Defendant contends that this was Plaintiff’s first visit with her, and Plaintiff contends he also saw Defendant twice between November 28 and December 3, 2015. (UMF 22, 24.) Plaintiff’s treatment plan for mild to moderate pain. (UMF 34.) Plaintiff submitted a Health Care Services…