(PC) Buckner v. Sacramento County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20212:21-cv-01922California365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LADARRIAN BUCKNER, No. 2:21-cv-1922 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order filed November 2, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit using this court’s form, and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. In accordance with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.