(SS) Rojas-Renteria v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20211:20-cv-01761California560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD LEE ROJAS-RENTERIA, No. 1:20-cv-1761-NONE-HBK (SS) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT

v. BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

PROSECUTION AND/OR FAILURE TO

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

SECURITY,

FOURTEEN-DAY RESPONSE PERIOD Defendant.

17 18 19 This matter is before the Court upon periodic review of the file. Plaintiff initiated this action with the assistance of counsel on December 14, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff was grated leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 3). On January 25, 2021, a Scheduling Order was entered. (Doc. No. 5). On May 6, 2021, the Court granted plaintiff’s counsel motion to withdraw and directed plaintiff, within thirty days, to have new counsel enter an appearance or alternatively advise the court whether he wished to proceed pro se. (Doc. No. 13). On May 17, 2021, the Commissioner lodged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.