Burger

(PC) Clark v. Burger

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20212:20-cv-00432California331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALPHONSO RAMON CLARK, No. 2:20-cv-0432 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed October 27, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to identify and serve the only remaining defendant. ECF No. 22. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to identify and serve the only remaining defendant and for failure to follow court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); L.R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.