Travelers Property Casualty Ins. Co. v. Sugar Bowl Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20212:20-cv-00654California2,265 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY No. 2:20-cv-00654-TLN-AC

INSURANCE COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

SUGAR BOWL CORPORATION,

15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to compel discovery. ECF No. 13. The parties submitted the required joint statement. ECF No. 18. The matter was submitted on the papers. ECF No. 16. Based on a review of the parties’ arguments and the record, the motion to compel is GRANTED. I. Introduction and Relevant Background This is an insurance subrogation action in which plaintiff, Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company (“Travelers”) seeks to recover monies paid to its insured, Celia Cummings, from defendant Sugar Bowl Corporation (“Sugar Bowl”). In March of 2017, Cummings sustained snow load damage to her home at the Sugar Bowl Village. ECF No. 18 at 2. Cummings and Travelers alleged that Sugar Bowl failed and refused to timely remove snow when requested multiple times…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.