Beltran

(PS) Rouse v. Beltran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20212:21-cv-01085California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 XEZAKIA ROUSE, No. 2:21–cv–1085–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF (ECF Nos. 2, 7)

STATE,

15 Defendant. 16 On November 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 7), which were served on the plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On November 29, 2021, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 8), which have been considered by the court. This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection

1 The Clerk of Court is instructed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.