(PS) Shoaga v. Nelson III

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20212:21-cv-01953California308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAIMI SHOAGA, No. 2:21–cv–1953–JAM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 2, 4) ANDREW NELSON III; CALIFORNIA

HEALTH CARE MEDICAL FACILITY,

15 Defendants. 16 On November 29, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations to deny plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, finding that plaintiff’s application indicates he is not unable to pay the filing fee. (ECF Nos. 2, 4.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and advised plaintiff that no objections period was required. See Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1114 (9th Cir. 1998), as amended (Sept. 9, 1998) (holding that plaintiffs are not entitled to file written objections to magistrate judge recommendation to deny IFP status). Plaintiff has not filed objections. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.