Hansber

Hansber v. Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20211:21-cv-00022California504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 SHAHARA HANSBER, et al., CASE NO. 1:21-cv-00022-AWI-JLT

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO SEAL

DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE

vs. MOTION TO JOIN THE NECESSARY

PARTY

ULTA BEAUTY COSMETICS, LLC; and (Doc. 34)

DOES 1-100,

14 Defendants.

16 The defendant seeks to seal documents upon which it relies for its motion to join a necessary party (Doc. 34) The defense contends that these documents contain confidential and proprietary information related to its business operations. Id. at 2. Despite the passage of the time allowed to oppose the request (Local Rule 141(c)), the plaintiffs have not opposed the motion. The request to seal documents is controlled by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The Rule permits the Court to issue orders to “protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including . . . requiring that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be revealed or be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.