Son
(PC) Hamilton v. Son
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HAMILTON, No. 2:19-cv-2210 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. SON, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion to compel discovery, ECF No. 26, which defendant opposes, ECF No. 29. On November 7, 2021,1 plaintiff filed a motion to compel the production of confidential records related to health care staff complaints made against defendant Son. ECF No. 26. Defendant opposes the motion on the grounds that plaintiff failed to attach a copy of the discovery requests at issue and that the motion is premature because the only request for production he received was served on October 21, 2021. ECF No. 29. In reply, plaintiff attaches a copy of a request for admissions dated October 4, 2021; he argues that his motion was not
This date reflects the application of the prison mailbox rule. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266,…