(PC) Ryles v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation at (SATF) Corcoran State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20211:21-cv-00064California538 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL JAMES RYLES, No. 1:21-cv-00064-NONE-JLT (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

13 v. ACTION 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF (Doc. No. 7) CORRECTION, et al., 15

16 Defendants. Clerk of the Court to close the case.

17 18 Plaintiff Michael James Ryles is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On November 30, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 22 recommendations recommending that the action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a 23 claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. No. 10.) In particular, the magistrate judge found 24 the following: plaintiff was not entitled to compassionate release1; claims against defendants 25 California Department of Correction and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.