Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO SANDOVAL, No. 1:20-cv-01374-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. No. 35) RALPH M. DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Julio Sandoval is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 22, 2021, this action was dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 33.) On December 13, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 35.) “There are four grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may be granted: 1) the motion is necessary to correct manifest errors of law or fact upon which the judgment is based; 2) the moving party presents newly discovered or previously unavailable evidence; 3) the motion is necessary to prevent manifest injustice; or 4) there is an intervening change in controlling…