Alweiss
Alweiss v. City of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL ALWEISS, individually and No. 2:21-cv-00784-JAM-DB as a class representative for all similarly situated permit applicants who are class members, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 18 Daniel Alweiss (“Plaintiff” or “Alweiss”) filed a six-count complaint against the City of Sacramento and two members of its Planning Department, Thomas Pace and Teresa Haenggi, collectively (“Defendants”), alleging four constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and two claims under California law for unfair business practices and negligence. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 11. Plaintiff opposes the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 13. Defendants replied. See Reply, ECF No. 15. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS…