Gastelo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM BARTON, Case No. 2:21-cv-01933-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

JOSIE GASTELO, ECF No. 3 Respondent.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS 17 On October 22, 2021, the court ordered petitioner to submit, within thirty days, either the $5 filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. To date, petitioner has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for petitioner’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439,…