Magrini

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLAS CRAIG BRUNSVIK, Case No. 2:21-cv-00973-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

ERIC MAGRINI, et al.,

Defendants. 16 On October 6, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 6. I notified plaintiff that he could proceed with his viable due process claim against defendants Johnson, Marlar, and South, but that his remaining claims were not cognizable. Id. at 3-4. I therefore ordered plaintiff, within sixty days, either to file an amended complaint or to notify the court that he wishes to proceed only with his due process claim. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute…