Unknown

(PC) Smith v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20212:21-cv-01917California439 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON SMITH, Case No. 2:21-cv-01917-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE,

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE

UNKNOWN, TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS Defendant. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS

17 On October 19, 2021, I ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, either the $402 filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. To date, plaintiff has neither paid the required filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.