Torres
(PC) Bradford v. Torres
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-2296 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. TORRES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. In his complaint, plaintiff sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis and provided an uncertified trust account statement. However, plaintiff is not permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this action because plaintiff has sustained three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Bradford v. German, No. 1:15-cv-1511 LJO BAM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2015) (ECF No. 4). Moreover, plaintiff does not seek relief with respect to conditions which adequately allege “imminent danger to serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Rather, plaintiff alleges that on October 26, 2021, certain defendants deprived plaintiff of the ADA wheelchair van with lift and plaintiff sustained a spinal injury while plaintiff was being transported to California State…