Hurley

(PC) Diaz v. Hurley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20212:19-cv-01241California697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ, No. 2:19-cv-1241 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

ASSOCIATE WARDEN HURLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. By order filed May 21, 2021, plaintiff’s first amended complaint was dismissed with leave to file a second amended complaint. On October 25, 2021, the undersigned recounted the myriad extensions of time plaintiff has been granted in this action, and granted plaintiff one final sixty-day extension of time to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 74 at 1-2, 4 n.3.) Plaintiff was advised that no further extensions of time would be granted for any reason. (ECF No. 74 at 4.) Sixty days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. Instead, plaintiff filed a motion seeking an order requiring physical access to the law library and to his insulin treatments. (ECF No. 75.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.