Burnes

(PC) Jaramillo v. Burnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20221:21-cv-00712California536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDIE ANTHONY JARAMILLO, No. 1:21-cv-00712-AWI-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

J. BURNES, et al., (Doc. No. 15) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Rudie Anthony Jaramillo is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 25, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order finding that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Doc. No. 13. Therefore, the magistrate judge ordered Plaintiff, within 21 days, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to exhaust. Id. at 2. Plaintiff failed to respond to the order to show cause within the time provided. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.