CDCR

(PC) Roberts v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20221:21-cv-01514California3,155 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID ROBERTS, ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01514-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION AND FINDINGS AND

CDCR, et al., ) RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING ) DISMISSAL Defendants. ) ) (ECF No. 23) )

Plaintiff David Roberts is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The action was transferred from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division on October 13, 2021. On October 15, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, found no claims to be cognizable, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint, but Plaintiff failed to do so. (ECF No. 22.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.