Ento
Ento v. Poland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTIAN DAVID ENTO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00247-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 JUDGE POLAND, et al., OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY
(30) DAYS Defendants. 16 17 On February 19, 2020, Christian David Ento, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action. 18 (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff has not filed anything since the complaint, including any request for leave 19 to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Accordingly, on November 2, 2021, the Court ordered him to 20 submit an IFP application or pay the filing fee within forty-five days. (ECF No. 2). The Court 21 warned him that, “[f]ailure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.” (Id. at 22 1). 23 The forty-five-day period has expired, and Plaintiff has failed to submit an IFP 24 application, pay the filing fee, or otherwise respond to the Court’s order. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY…