(PC) Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20222:21-cv-00409California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, No. 2:21-cv-0409 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 By order filed August 10, 2021, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 6. The record reflects that after plaintiff filed a notice of change of address in another case, the screening order was re-served on plaintiff at his new address on October 6, 2021. After plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, he was given an additional twenty-one days to amend the complaint and warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. ECF No. 11. Twenty-one days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.