CDCR

(PC) Gleason v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20222:20-cv-00369California1,260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS LEE GLEASON, JR., No. 2:20-cv-00369-TLN-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court are plaintiff’s four separate motions to compel discovery responses from defendants. ECF No. 32. Defendant Largoza has filed an opposition and the time has expired for plaintiff to file a reply. ECF No. 35. For the reasons explained below, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion. This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s complaint alleging a First Amendment retaliation, Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference, and Rehabilitation Act claims against defendant N. Largoza as well as supplemental state law claims for violating The Disabled Persons Act and The Bane Act. The court also found service of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.