Mayfield

(PC) Ramos v. Mayfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20221:21-cv-01036California1,877 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEOBARDO ERIC RAMOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01036-NONE-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND REQUEST FOR

MAYFIELD, et al., LEAVE TO AMEND BE DENIED

(ECF No. 18) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

Leobardo Ramos (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has recommended that this case proceed only on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Mayfield and defendant Doe. (ECF No. 12). This Eighth Amendment claim is based on allegations that these defendants took Plaintiff into an empty room, slammed Plaintiff onto his shoulder, stood on Plaintiff’s ankles, and kicked him, all while Plaintiff was in restraints. (Id. at pgs. 11-12). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.