Rush v. City of Fairfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20222:21-cv-01120California4,571 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

STANLEY GOFF goffs@mail2world.com LAW OFFICE OF STANLEY GOFF 15 Boardman Place San Francisco, CA, 94103 Telephone: (415) 571-9570 Attorney for Plaintiffs CALVIN RUSH and JAYME RUSH 5 DALE L. ALLEN, JR., State Bar No. 145279 dallen@aghwlaw.com KEVIN P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 252290 kallen@aghwlaw.com

ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP

180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 697-2000 Facsimile: (415) 813-2045 10 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF FAIRFIELD, ZACHARY SANDOVAL, and DUSTIN JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO COURTHOUSE

15 CALVIN RUSH and JAYME RUSH, Case No.: 2:21-cv-01120-WBS-KJN 16 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 141.1 v. 18 CITY OF FAIRFIELD, et al., 19 Defendants. 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.