(PS) Ponthieux v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20222:18-cv-00608California2,885 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH J. PONTHIEUX, et al., No. 2:18-cv-0608 JAM DB PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC;

AZTEC FORECLOSURE

CORPORATION, Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs, Keith J. Ponthieux, Chris Duenas, and Maria Duenas, are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendant Aztec Foreclosure Corporation’s, (“Aztec”), motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 80.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that the motion for summary judgment be denied without prejudice to renewal. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on March 21, 2018, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs are proceeding on a third amended complaint filed on April 7, 2020. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.