Westbrook

(PC) Jeffrey T. Eastman v. Westbrook

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20221:21-cv-00797California4,543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY TODD EASTMAN, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00797-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

ACTION

ROBERT B. WESTBROOK, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 16) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Jeffrey Todd Eastman is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on May 17, 2021. On July 21, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found that no cognizable claims were stated, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, and on August 30, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause within fourteen days why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 10.) After Plaintiff failed to respond to the order to show cause, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations to dismiss the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.