Snyder

Snyder v. Stanislaus County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20221:19-cv-00679California980 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KAREN SNYDER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00679-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE:

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH

v. PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(2) STANISLAUS COUNTY, et al., (ECF NO. 40) Defendants. 15 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Karen Snyder’s request for dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). (ECF No. 40). For the reasons given, the Court recommends that the request for dismissal be granted.1 I. BACKGROUND This civil action alleging claims of negligence and breach of contract was removed from the Stanislaus Superior Court on May 16, 2019.2 (ECF No. 1). On July 13, 2021, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Pomco Insurance (also known as Pomco West, Inc.) brought a third-party complaint against Third-Party Defendant Healthcare Strategies, Inc. and Does 1 through 10. (ECF No. 33).

1 The Court issues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.