Hernandez

Hernandez v. Bobst, North America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20221:19-cv-00882California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and BECKY No. 1:19-cv-00882-NONE-SKO

HERNANDEZ,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A v. DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND CLOSE THE CASE

BOBST GROUP NORTH AMERICA,

INC., (Doc. 85)

16 Defendant.

18 On January 3, 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 85.) In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows: [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary 24 judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after 26 service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.