Uddin

(PC) Burton v. Uddin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20222:19-cv-01616California2,536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENDALL BURTON, No. 2:19-cv-1616 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND MESKATH UDDIN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on a claim for denial of medical care arising under the Eighth Amendment and a claim arising under the First Amendment based upon retaliation for protected activity against defendant Uddin. Defendant Uddin’s motion for summary judgment is before the court. I. Additional Discovery Plaintiff asks that the court delay resolution of defendant’s motion for summary judgment and permit plaintiff to conduct “additional discovery.” It appears that plaintiff seeks portions of his own medical records. Under Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court may delay resolution of a motion for summary judgment and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.