(PS) Vicari v. Jackson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20222:21-cv-02117California2,341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DONALD ANGELO VICARI, No. 2:21-cv-02117-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER HARMAN JACKSON, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a county prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on November 15, 2021 (ECF No. 1) and paid the filing fee on December 29, 2021 (Docket Notation). Plaintiff’s complaint states a cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) against defendants City of Jackson, California, the Jackson Police Department, and Officer Herman. If the allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of the action. The Clerk of the Court will be directed to issue the appropriate number of summonses to plaintiff for purposes of service of process. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Plaintiff shall complete service of process in accordance with Federal Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.