(SS) Xiong v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20221:19-cv-01473California4,297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEE THAO, o/b/o J.X., Case No. 1:19-cv-01473-HBK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER TO REMAND CASE

TO COMMISSIONER

v. (Doc. No. 18) ANDREW SAUL,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, Defendant. 17 Mee Thao, on behalf of Plaintiff J.X. (“Plaintiff”), a minor, seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 18, 24-25). For the reasons stated , the Court orders this matter REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. I. JURISDICTION On January 21, 2015, Mee Thao protectively filed for supplemental security income on behalf of Plaintiff J.X., a minor, with an alleged onset date of October 21, 2011. (AR 193-201). Benefits…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.