(PC) Caruso v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20221:15-cv-00780California8,468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GINA CARUSO, CASE NO. 1:15-CV-780 AWI EPG (PC)

Plaintiff

ORDER ON SUPPLEMENTAL

v. MOTIONS IN LIMINE

OFFICER G. SOLORIO, OFFICER C. LOPEZ, SGT. G. INGRAM, and (Doc. Nos. 327, 329, 330, 331, 332) OFFICER D. MARTINEZ,

Defendants

15 16 This case arises out of an encounter between incarcerated Plaintiff Gina Caruso (“Caruso”) and Defendant prison guards G. Solorio (“Solorio”), C. Lopez (“Lopez”), D. Martinez (“Martinez”), and Sgt. G. Ingram (“Ingram”) (collectively “Defendants”). The operative complaint is the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). The SAC contains two viable claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, an Eighth Amendment claim for excessive force and a Fourth Amendment claim for an unreasonable search. Currently before the Court are Caruso’s four supplemental motions in limine and Defendants’ two supplemental motions in limine. Hearing on the motions was held on January 4, 2022, and the Court took all supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.