Pfeiffer

(PC) Bueno v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20221:21-cv-01522California382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSENDO BUENO, ) No.: 1:21-cv-01522-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., ) COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) Defendants. ) (Doc. No. 7) ) )

Plaintiff Rosendo Bueno is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 29, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the instant action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. No. 7.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within fourteen days. (Id. at 6.) Plaintiff filed objections on January 3, 2022. (Doc. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.