Ciolli

(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20221:20-cv-01802California1,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY BARRETT, No. 1:20-cv-01802-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A. CIOLLI, (Doc. Nos. 22, 24) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Anthony Curtis Barrett is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that his constitutional rights were violated during an extended lockdown of his prison cell block. (Doc. No. 22.) Specifically, plaintiff alleges that prison staff improperly took plaintiff’s property in violation of the Due Process Clause; that prison staff denied plaintiff basic personal hygiene supplies, medical and psychological care, adequate nutrition, and access to the courts for at least one week; and that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.