Schultz

Schultz v. County of San Joaquin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20222:19-cv-02468California2,650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

PAUL SCHULTZ,

12 No. 2:19-cv-02468-TLN-KJN Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN; SAN

JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF STEVE

MOORE; DEPUTY SHERIFFS AYERS,

BALLARD, BINGHAM, GRAHAM,

GRUBB, HERRERO, HOSKINS,

JOHNSON, KISSELL, MORENO,

MORTENSEN, PADILLA, REYES,

RUST, WESTON, WHELEN;DOES 1–50;

UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE;

UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE’S

AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES NORMA

AHUILAR, MATTHEW MORENO, GREG LATIMER; and DOES 51–100, 22 Defendants. 23 /// /// /// /// 28 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of San Joaquin1 (the “County”), San Joaquin County Sheriff Steve Moore (“Moore”), and Deputy Sheriffs Ayers, Ballard, Bingham, Graham, Grubb, Herrero, Hoskins, Johnson, Kissell, Moreno, Mortensen, Padilla, Reyes, Rust, Weston, and Whelen’s (“Deputies”) (collectively, “County Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff filed an opposition. (ECF No. 7.) County Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 9.) Also pending before the Court is Defendant Universal Protection Service, LP’s2 7 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.