Schultz
Schultz v. County of San Joaquin
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20222:19-cv-02468California2,650 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
PAUL SCHULTZ,
12 No. 2:19-cv-02468-TLN-KJN Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN; SAN
JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF STEVE
MOORE; DEPUTY SHERIFFS AYERS,
BALLARD, BINGHAM, GRAHAM,
GRUBB, HERRERO, HOSKINS,
JOHNSON, KISSELL, MORENO,
MORTENSEN, PADILLA, REYES,
RUST, WESTON, WHELEN;DOES 1–50;
UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE;
UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE’S
AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES NORMA
AHUILAR, MATTHEW MORENO, GREG LATIMER; and DOES 51–100, 22 Defendants. 23 /// /// /// /// 28 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of San Joaquin1 (the “County”), San Joaquin County Sheriff Steve Moore (“Moore”), and Deputy Sheriffs Ayers, Ballard, Bingham, Graham, Grubb, Herrero, Hoskins, Johnson, Kissell, Moreno, Mortensen, Padilla, Reyes, Rust, Weston, and Whelen’s (“Deputies”) (collectively, “County Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff filed an opposition. (ECF No. 7.) County Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 9.) Also pending before the Court is Defendant Universal Protection Service, LP’s2 7 …