(PC) Rojas v. Fairfield Superior Court Clerk's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20222:21-cv-00967California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:21-cv-00967-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER FAIRFIELD SUPERIOR COURT

CLERK’S OFFICE,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 2, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is the Plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.