(PC) Rojas v. Fairfield Superior Court Clerk's Office
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:21-cv-00967-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER FAIRFIELD SUPERIOR COURT
CLERK’S OFFICE,
15 Defendant.
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 2, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is the Plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule…