Yoshida

Yoshida v. Vista Energy Marketing

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20222:20-cv-01944California4,652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONICA YOSHIDA, individually and on No. 2:20-cv-01944-TLN-CKD behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 VISTA ENERGY MARKETING LP, a Texas limited partnership; IRISH MARKETING LLC, a Texas limited liability company; RANSLEM CAPITAL LP, a Texas Limited partnership; WHALE FAMILY INVESTMENTS LP, a Texas limited partnership; DAVID RANSLEM, an individual’ MICHAEL WHALEN, an individual; RETHINK DIRECT INC., a Pennsylvania corporation; KENNY MCGUFFEY, an individual; TRAVIS SMITH, an individual; and DOES 1– 25,000, inclusive, 21 Defendants.

23 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Vista Energy Marketing L.P. (“Vista”) and Irish Marketing, LLC’s (“Irish Marketing”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff Monica Yoshida (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 20.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 35.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.