Montejo

(PC) Barth v. Montejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20222:19-cv-01874California1,031 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHAWN DAMON BARTH, No. 2:19-cv-1874 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER EUSEBIO MONTEJO, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs, retaliated against him, and discriminated against him. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s request for leave to file a motion to compel (ECF No. 65), motion to compel (ECF No. 66), and motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 70). I. Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Compel and Motion to Compel On November 24, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a motion to compel concurrently with a motion to compel. (ECF Nos. 65, 66.) Therein, plaintiff sought an order to compel defendants to respond to his discovery requests. He stated that, he served a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.